COMMISSION PROPOSES TO AMEND PART 97 RULES GOVERNING
Download Full Text of FCC NRPM WT 97-12 (~ 1.5 MB .pdf file)
|
|
WT Docket No. 97 -- The ARRL on December 12, 1995 asked the FCC for rulemaking to modify existing Part 97 Amateur Radio regulations on SS. The American Radio Relay League, Incorporated (the League), the national association of amateur radio operators in the United States, respectfully requests that the Commission issue a Notice of Proposed Rule Making at an early date, looking toward the amendment of the Commission's Rules and Regulations regarding the Amateur Radio Service, in order to facilitate, to a greater extent than is done by the present rules, the contributions of the Amateur Service to the development of spread- spectrum communications. The petition proposes
|
FULL TEXT OF NEWS RELEASENEWSReport No. DC 96-36 ACTION IN DOCKET CASE April 25, 1996COMMISSION PROPOSES TO MAKE SPECTRUM AVAILABLE FOR USE BY NEW UNLICENSED EQUIPMENT; NII/SUPERNet Devices Would Facilitate Interconnection to NII (ET Docket No. 96-102) The Commission has adopted a Notice of Proposed Rule Making to make available 350 megahertz of spectrum at 5.15 - 5.35 GHz and 5.725 - 5.875 GHz for use by a new category of unlicensed equipment called NII/SUPERNet devices. The Commission stated the proposed rules would foster the development of a broad range of new devices, stimulate the growth of new industries, and promote the ability of U.S. manufacturers to compete globally by enabling them to develop unlicensed digital products for the world market. NII/SUPERNet devices would provide short-range, high-speed wireless digital information transfer and could support the creation of new wireless local area networks (LANs) as well as facilitate access to the National Information Infrastructure without the expense of wiring. These devices may further the universal service goals of the Telecommunications Act by offering classrooms, libraries, health care providers, and other users inexpensive networking alternatives which may access advanced telecommunications services. To further promote technical and operational flexibility, the Commission has proposed to regulate NII/SUPERNet devices under Part 15 of the FCC rules. Unlicensed Part 15 status would facilitate spectrum reuse and provide protection to incumbent and proposed primary operations. The Commission also has proposed only the minimum technical standards necessary to prevent interference to other unlicensed devices and incumbent services and to ensure that the spectrum is used efficiently. The proposed rules specify power limits, out-of-band emission limits, and a basic "listen-before-talk" protocol standard. The industry is encouraged to develop any additional protocol standards believed necessary. The Commission initiated this proceeding in response to Petitions for Rule Making submitted by Wireless Information Networks Forum (WINForum) and Apple Computer, Inc. - FCC - Action by the Commission April 25, 1996, by Notice of Proposed Rule Making (FCC 96-193). Chairman Hundt, Commissioners Quello, Ness, and Chong, with Commissioner Ness issuing a statement. News Media contact: Rochelle Cohen at (202) 418-0500. Office of Engineering and Technology contacts: Tom Derenge at (202) 418-2451 and Fred Thomas at (202) 418-2449. OF COMMISSIONER SUSAN NESS Re: Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Unlicensed NII/SUPERNet Operations in the 5 GHz Frequency Range The rulemaking we are initiating forcefully demonstrates how wise spectrum management can deliver valuable new services to American homes, schools, businesses, and other institutions. The radio spectrum is a precious national resource. Responsible stewardship of the spectrum is a primary mission of this Commission. As part of that stewardship, I believe setting aside some portion of the spectrum for shared, unlicensed use is of demonstrable benefit. Today's Notice heralds a new generation of unlicensed devices, with great potential for innovation, economic growth, and international trade. Unlicensed devices include a growing array of products that improve the quality of life. Cordless telephones, garage door openers, security and alarm systems, electronic toys, and baby monitors are some of the most notable examples of unlicensed devices found in the home or in the car. Unlicensed devices are also increasingly essential to businesses. Remote meter reading, medical patient monitoring, inventory control systems, and antipilferage systems are already widely deployed. Literally billions of dollars have already been invested in the development of unlicensed devices, and the benefits have been considerable. But the future holds still greater promise. Based on the WINForum and Apple Computer proposals which led us to initiate this rulemaking, I believe unlicensed devices using radio spectrum above 5 GHz can play a vital role in meeting established and incipient needs for communications offering mobility, flexibility, versatility, and economy. Especially enticing are the prospects for wireless local area networks to connect classroom computers to each other -- and to the world beyond. Low-power radio technology can serve as a low-cost, high-bandwidth, on-ramp to the Information Superhighway for the leaders and workers of tomorrow. Such an application would be directly responsive to the wishes of Congress, as reflected in Sections 254(b)(6), 254(c)(3), 254(h)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Health care providers and their patients may also be among the main beneficiaries of this kind of technology. What is more, unlicensed devices are consistent with the objectives of reinventing government. The costs, fees, and delays of licensing can be avoided; equipment authorization can be streamlined, reducing time to market. Minimal technical standards to prevent harmful interference can leave maximum opportunities for innovation. A modest enabling gesture by government can give dozens or even hundreds of entrepreneurs incentives to translate good ideas into useful products. I am especially enthusiastic about the proposal tendered by WINForum for short-haul transmissions. The plan is sufficiently concrete that we can easily foresee how the promised benefits can be realized. The HIPERLAN experience proves the feasibility of spectrum sharing with mobile satellite services. International commonality maximizes the market base over which product development costs can be spread. Enabling simultaneous operation of multiple units at 24 Mbps will support computing, video, and multimedia applications, thereby meeting the needs of Information Age users. I am also intrigued by the Apple long-haul proposal, which contemplates low-cost broadband links from homes to schools and libraries. It may also solve some of the special problems of providing broadband service in rural areas. The use of higher power levels, however, requires that we proceed more cautiously. How do we prevent interference to the wireless LANs and other low-power unlicensed devices that will be sharing the same frequencies? Also, at what point do the characteristics of a service make it more appropriate for provision on a licensed basis? These and other questions remain to be answered. Because of the need for compatibility, I believe manufacturers of unlicensed products using shared frequency bands have strong marketplace incentives to develop a workable spectrum etiquette. As in the case of unlicensed PCS at 2 GHz, a spectrum etiquette may minimize the potential for interference while providing maximum flexibility for technological innovation and spectrum efficiency. I hope commenting parties will assist us in thinking through this issue. Overall, I believe we are on a course that will bring substantial benefits, with no intrusive governmental intervention. This is responsible spectrum management -- and good public policy. I look forward to completing this rulemaking expeditiously. |
| Search | E-zine Menu | Pegasus Tech | Welcome | Home |